Denis Wick 2.5CC vs Kelly 50-SS

The Kelly 50-SS has a wider cup diameter, the Kelly 50-SS features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2.5CC
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width7.20 mm / 0.2835 in
    Throat diameter8.60 mm / 0.3386 in
    BackboreV-type
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Kelly 50-SS
      • Tuba
      General
      Cup diameter33.27 mm / 1.3098 in
      Cup depth
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      BackboreM
      Finish
      Material316 Surgical Stainless Steel
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📋Deep bowl tuba

      Cup Diameter

      The Kelly 50-SS has a cup diameter of 33.27 mm / 1.3098 in compared to 32.00 mm / 1.2598 in on the Denis Wick 2.5CC — a difference of 1.27 mm / 0.0500 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Kelly 50-SS has a — cup while the Denis Wick 2.5CC has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC is described as unspecified, and the Kelly 50-SS as 316 Surgical Stainless Steel. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2.5CC details Kelly 50-SS details Denis Wick 2.5CC equivalents Kelly 50-SS equivalents