Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 vs Denis Wick 2.5CC

The Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2.5CC has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 231-C 4
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.00 mm / 1.2992 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.20 mm / 0.3228 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 2.5CC
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width7.20 mm / 0.2835 in
      Throat diameter8.60 mm / 0.3386 in
      BackboreV-type
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a cup diameter of 33.00 mm / 1.2992 in compared to 32.00 mm / 1.2598 in on the Denis Wick 2.5CC — a difference of 1.00 mm / 0.0394 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a wider throat (8.60 mm / 0.3386 in vs 8.20 mm / 0.3228 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 details Denis Wick 2.5CC details Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 equivalents Denis Wick 2.5CC equivalents