Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) vs Schilke 67

Both mouthpieces share similar core dimensions — the differences are in the details.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 67
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.41 mm / 1.2760 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.33 mm / 0.3280 in
      Backbore21/64.3281"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) details Schilke 67 details Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) equivalents Schilke 67 equivalents