Kelly 24AW vs Schilke S-H

The Schilke S-H has a wider cup diameter, the Kelly 24AW features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Kelly 24AW
    • Tuba
    General
    Cup diameter31.24 mm / 1.2299 in
    Cup depthVery deep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    BackboreXL
    Finish
    MaterialLexan polycarbonate
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📋Tuba / sousaphone
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke S-H
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter31.84 mm / 1.2535 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter7.49 mm / 0.2949 in
      BackboreM.295"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke S-H has a cup diameter of 31.84 mm / 1.2535 in compared to 31.24 mm / 1.2299 in on the Kelly 24AW — a difference of 0.60 mm / 0.0236 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Kelly 24AW has a very deep cup while the Schilke S-H has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Kelly 24AW is described as Lexan polycarbonate, and the Schilke S-H as unspecified. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Kelly 24AW details Schilke S-H details Kelly 24AW equivalents Schilke S-H equivalents