GR Technologies 66M vs Marcinkiewicz CH 13

The GR Technologies 66M has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz CH 13 features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    GR Technologies 66M
    • Trumpet
    Cup diameter16.76 mm / 0.6598 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH 13
      • Trumpet
      Cup diameter16.31 mm / 0.6421 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.66 mm / 0.1441 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The GR Technologies 66M has a cup diameter of 16.76 mm / 0.6598 in compared to 16.31 mm / 0.6421 in on the Marcinkiewicz CH 13 — a difference of 0.45 mm / 0.0177 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Marcinkiewicz CH 13 has a very deep cup while the GR Technologies 66M has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece GR Technologies 66M details Marcinkiewicz CH 13 details GR Technologies 66M equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH 13 equivalents