Denis Wick RW2FL vs Denis Wick RW3FL
The Denis Wick RW2FL has a wider cup diameter.
Mouthpiece A
Denis Wick RW2FL
• Flugelhorn
Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width4.92 mm / 0.1937 in
Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
Backboreopen
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
High-volume projection — open throat for power
vs
Mouthpiece B
Denis Wick RW3FL
• Flugelhorn
Cup diameter16.75 mm / 0.6594 in
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width6.05 mm / 0.2382 in
Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
Backboreopen
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
High-volume projection — open throat for power
Cup Diameter
The Denis Wick RW2FL has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.75 mm / 0.6594 in on the Denis Wick RW3FL — a difference of 0.25 mm / 0.0098 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.
Cup Depth
Both mouthpieces share a very deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.
Throat Diameter
Throat diameters are essentially identical at 4.58 mm / 0.1803 in, so resistance feel will be comparable.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.