Conn Precision 2 (Mello) vs Denis Wick 4F

the Denis Wick 4F features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Conn Precision 2 (Mello)
    • Flugelhorn
    General
    Cup diameter
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    MaterialSilver-plated brass
    Best suited for
    📋Mellophone
    🎶Shallow cup; brighter tone
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 4F
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width5.17 mm / 0.2035 in
      Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
      Backboreopen
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 4F has a very deep cup while the Conn Precision 2 (Mello) has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Conn Precision 2 (Mello) is described as Silver-plated brass, and the Denis Wick 4F as unspecified. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Conn Precision 2 (Mello) details Denis Wick 4F details Conn Precision 2 (Mello) equivalents Denis Wick 4F equivalents