Conn Imp. Precision 4 vs Schilke SH-IIF

the Conn Imp. Precision 4 features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Conn Imp. Precision 4
    • Tuba
    General
    Cup diameter
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    MaterialSilver-plated brass
    Best suited for
    📋Small Eb bass
    🎶Full rich tone
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke SH-IIF
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.76 mm / 1.2898 in
      Cup depthShallow
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.03 mm / 0.3161 in
      BackboreO.316"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Conn Imp. Precision 4 has a deep cup while the Schilke SH-IIF has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Conn Imp. Precision 4 is described as Silver-plated brass, and the Schilke SH-IIF as unspecified. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Conn Imp. Precision 4 details Schilke SH-IIF details Conn Imp. Precision 4 equivalents Schilke SH-IIF equivalents