Bruno Tilz 310-M 42 vs Denis Wick 3SL

The Bruno Tilz 310-M 42 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 42 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 42
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.00 mm / 1.2992 in
    Cup depth
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.90 mm / 0.3504 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 3SL
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter31.25 mm / 1.2303 in
      Cup depthShallow
      Rim width8.11 mm / 0.3193 in
      Throat diameter7.62 mm / 0.3000 in
      Backboresmall
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 42 has a cup diameter of 33.00 mm / 1.2992 in compared to 31.25 mm / 1.2303 in on the Denis Wick 3SL — a difference of 1.75 mm / 0.0689 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 42 has a wider throat (8.90 mm / 0.3504 in vs 7.62 mm / 0.3000 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 42 details Denis Wick 3SL details Bruno Tilz 310-M 42 equivalents Denis Wick 3SL equivalents