Bach 17C vs Bruno Tilz 304- A 2

The Bach 17C has a wider cup diameter, the Bach 17C features a deeper cup, the Bach 17C has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bach 17C
    • Baritone / Euphonium
    Cup diameter24.20 mm / 0.9528 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter5.85 mm / 0.2303 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Bruno Tilz 304- A 2
      • Baritone / Euphonium
      Catalog
      Cup diameter23.00 mm / 0.9055 in
      Cup depthVery shallow
      Rim width
      Throat diameter4.60 mm / 0.1811 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bach 17C has a cup diameter of 24.20 mm / 0.9528 in compared to 23.00 mm / 0.9055 in on the Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 — a difference of 1.20 mm / 0.0472 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Bach 17C has a shallow cup while the Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 has a very shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bach 17C has a wider throat (5.85 mm / 0.2303 in vs 4.60 mm / 0.1811 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bach 17C details Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 details Bach 17C equivalents Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 equivalents