Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick RW3FL

The Denis Wick RW3FL has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick RW3FL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick RW3FL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup depthShallow
    Best suited for
    Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick RW3FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup depthVery deep
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick RW3FL has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Denis Wick RW3FL details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents Denis Wick RW3FL equivalents